The Worth of a Woman
What is interesting about the "Wear Pants to Church Day" is that it is not going against church policy. Most of what the women founders of the event want is cultural change. They aren't asking to go against church policy. They don't want to be men. But, they may want to hold their baby as it is being blessed. They want to understand why the Elder's quorum president is called "President Jackson" and the relief society president is called "Sister Jackson". Wearing their pants is simply a means of expressing that some women are in pain with how we feel relegated to certain roles and molds that we don't easily fit into. Maybe YOU are 100% happy with your role in the LDS church. But, can you sympathize with those of us who aren't? Can't you show that you are willing to not pigeonhole women?
Elder Packer stated in a talk yesterday Feb 11, 2012: "I have been very careful, and am very careful, to treat my wife with that respect and reverence that is due her in performing that thing that is of most worth for a woman in this life to live the gospel, to be the wife and the mother of the children of a worthy holder of the priesthood."
His rhetoric re-emphasized my feelings expressed in a personal journal/blog post from 2008:
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2008
It was a crisp and beautiful Sunday fall morning. I had arrived to church early, with plenty of time to pick out seating on a padded pew, but I felt more comfortable sitting in the back instead. The area we moved into 2 years earlier was continually growing and our church attendance was increasing at a proportional rate. It was thereby a full meeting and many of us were sitting in the metal folding chairs already set up in the overflow. My husband and children joined me shortly before the meeting started.
The lesson for the day was on General Conference, a two day bi-annual meeting held by the church to provide inspiration to all members. General Conference was to be held next week and I assumed today we would be hearing about taking advantage of the opportunity to listen to a prophet of our day. I listened as the stake Relief Society president, a woman with a slightly aged face (maybe 40's or early 50's), started speaking.
I understand that not everything stated over the pulpit of one church is the opinion of the church as a whole, so I sat quietly for some time as she started dispensing her advice. I shook my head ever so slightly, so that it would only be noticeable to those who might have been looking closely, but not enough to distract others, as she told us that we should not shop on the Saturday of conference. She continued that we should make sure to still dress up on Sunday, despite the fact that General Conference is held via cable or satellite television, and that we should not use pillows or get comfortable while watching. I disagreed, but could see where she was coming from. She felt that it was important for us to pay attention and listen intently, not nod off to sleep.
Next she began giving advice for the priesthood session, a two hour Saturday night session in which the men must go to the nearest church in order to receive instruction. This session is not beamed to any public stations and is not released until after the session is over. She started… “Before the men head off to the session we, as wives should be sure that we make sure they are not rushed or there is not commotion before they leave…. This includes ironing their shirts, setting the table and serving dinner early enough that it is done before they leave.”
I sat there stunned. I squirmed in my seat. I started looking around for other reactions. Women were hushing children, reading books to them, and staring off blankly. Children were running down the aisles, coloring in their color books or squirming like me. Several men were nodding off, helping children or also staring off. Was anyone else hearing this?
She continued, “Typically, many of you women gather together as the men are in priesthood session and do crafty things.” Phew. I never liked crafty things. She’s coming around, I thought. “While this may be fun, getting together to chat and make things is not the best thing we can do with our time together. Instead we should gather our girls and proceed to take this time to teach them much needed homemaking skills such as sewing.”
Wow.
I had been attending church with my husband for the last year even though I didn't consider myself to be a "true believer" anymore. I had felt that because I was devout when we married, I therefore had committed to this life. This religion is how we always wanted to raise our children, and I continued to been supportive despite my new disaffection. What could teaching my children religious principles hurt?
But as I sat there in on this Sunday, I was flooded with all the negatives. I looked at my two beautiful 9 year old daughters. How much of this were they hearing? How much were they internalizing? I turned to my own thoughts as a woman and things I regretted not being able to do simply because I was a "righteous" female. This was not an isolated incident. I started thinking back on lessons as a child, young woman and an adult and how many times I was told what type of person I should be because of the sex I was born as. I am more than a maid. I am more than a sewing machine. I am more than a cook. I am more than a mother. I am more than a wife. I need to be more. My girls need to know that they are more.
I could feel my emotions overpowering me. I looked to the bishop and his counselors on the stand. I pleaded internally for someone to stop this woman. But their silence spoke volumes. I was literally shaking and I wanted to scream. This kind of rhetoric was damaging. I leaned over and told my husband, “That’s it. I can’t take it anymore.” I quickly left the meeting and tears started pouring down. I found the first exit out and headed home. At this point I was an emotional wreck. I quickly walked across the parking lot toward the sidewalk.
I tried not to make eye contact with the sole person in the parking lot, but noticed it was the stake president. He was not oblivious to my uncontrollable sobs and asked if I was okay. Not breaking my pace, I replied back, “I’m fine.” He replied, “Do you want to talk?” No, I didn’t want to talk. Again I replied, “I’m fine.” I was to the sidewalk by this point and quickly on my way home. The stake president really seemed like a good man. For a short moment I thought maybe it would be good to talk, but really what could he say? He simply wouldn’t understand. The patriarchy never will.
6 comments:
Great post, and my own feelings really resonate with everything you said. I only have boys, but even for them, I do not want this type of message put in their heads. I want them to see their wives as full human beings, not as accessories to men. Packard's sentiments are a relic of his generation, and it saddens me that people would take it as gospel.
Love it. Love you!!!
Yes, thank you! How can you do anything other than feel such despair when they say you tell you you're worth less and only worth something compared to a man. I remember that feeling of utter despair the summer I entered the temple and was "forced" to veil my face while the men did not need to. It was a "soul"-destroying moment. I'm so glad I'm done.
I have been thinking about this post all day. You have some great points. I agree that a woman's worth shouldn't be "tied" to that of a worthy priesthood holder but, I don't think that is what Elder Packer meant when he said it that way. I love being a mother and wife and I know that my Heavenly Father would love me regardless of those titles. I am of worth simply because I know that I am a daughter of a God who loves me and cares for me and wants me to be with him again. I believe Elder Packer was trying to remind us that having a family is of great worth. And really, in the eternities, my knowledge and my family are the only things that will be there with me. Why would someone want to be alone forever??
I think it's important to understand the difference between salvation and exaltation. According to the church website Salvation is: "To be saved from both physical and spiritual death. All people will be saved from physical death by the grace of God, through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Each individual can also be saved from spiritual death as well by the grace of God, through faith in Jesus Christ. This faith is manifested in a life of obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel and service to Christ."
Exaltation is: "The highest state of happiness and glory in the celestial kingdom." And does require one to be married according to God's law.
These are 2 very different things. Both point to our potential after this life. One we achieve on our own - salvation. While the other we can only achieve as a righteous couple.
I actually like your point Michelle. Well thought out!! I wasn't looking at the eternal perspective of the church.
The problem I have with trying to see an eternal perspective is 1) Finding a female role model and 2) Having no scriptural knowledge of what women's roles are after this life. If I remember right, I get to raise more babies only to never have my name mentioned or get to talk to my own children when they need me the most.
Bensen, 1981: "Provide your daughters with opportunities to develop their own skills, by allowing them to bake, cook, sew, and arrange their own rooms."
Certainly, these skills aren't going to be useful in the eternities will they? That would be my idea of hell. :)
This post broke my heart tonight. I am typically 100% confident in my decision to remove my children from the church. Yesterday I wasn't. I felt guilty, I felt selfish, I felt unsure. I am so happy to have friends I can lean on and learn from when I'm feeling freaked out of my brain. I hope that my daughters know what I did for them and I hope they are grateful. It's tough and it breaks me emotionally every once in a while. You are awesome girl. xoxo
Post a Comment